On Wed, 10 Nov 1999, Philip Hazel wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Nov 1999, The Flying Hamster wrote:
>
> > 385846T To: "Du Plessis, Yolande" <ydplessis@???>,
> > &&10
[...]
> > Not sure there's a fix or a config option I can tweak (reading docs now)
> > but this might be something other people haven't seen.
>
> You can put
> HEADER_MAXSIZE=xxxx
Perfect, recompile time :)
> is, one megabyte. I didn't think this was very large, so I can't quite
> see where the 100M comes from. Is there perhaps some rewriting involved?
Sod all, the email in question arrived on relay2 and attempted to forward
it to relay1. Relay1 should only take the email in and forward via a
special routing rule directly to a sendmail box (I can't have that as the
primary MX because it's sendmail.cf is broken in various places and
horrible in the extreme).
Additionally there is only one recipient in the envelope, the rest
of the "To:" header is irrlevent as far as I'm concerned.
Mark
--
This is a sig, it's not a smart sig or an AI sig, but it's a sig to
replace the sig that died during the death of data... the sig is dead,
long live the sig
