It llok a good idea, except the part where you suggest to look at
the TO part ...
since most of these messages come from mailing lists i cannot
rely on anything that is IN the message .
however the $user should be ok.
In effect is just for the lists that the local user must be noticed to
change subscriptions, for personal mail should be ok to send just
to the sender, interestingly enought: how can one be sure not to
send the "changed address" notify to lists ? (Cheching that the
local address is in the to ? but how to cope with messages bcc-ed
and message sent to another alias (Since this check is done
before reading the aliases directors !!) ?
On 21 Oct 99, at 15:37, Gyan Mathur wrote:
> In response to "Leonardo Boselli":
>
> > I would like to put something that for every message addressd to
> > user@??? would both deleiver the message and send both to the
> > user AND to the sender a short message stationg that all addresses
> > of the form user@??? had become user@???
>
> For the message to the sender, an autoreply transport invoked by an
> unseen smartuser director with domains = a.g.c.d . For the message to
> the recipient, I would suggest off the top of my head a pipe transport
> invoked by an unseen smartuser director with domains = a.g.c.d to pipe
> the message (or only the headers in fact) to a script that picks out
> the To: field and generates the message. In both cases the director
> needs to have senders = ! exim@??? or similar, to stop the message
> to the user generating two more messages. The directors need to be
> unseen and near the start of the set of directors so that the message
> falls through to whatever is actually going to deliver it.
>
> Gyan.
>
>
> --
> ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
> ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
Leonardo Boselli (NIT)
Dipartimento Ingegneria Civile
Universita` di Firenze
Via Santa Marta 3
I-50139 Firenze
+39()055-4796-431
