Re: [EXIM] sender_host_[accept|reject]_relay and performance…

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Marc Haber
Date:  
To: exim-users
Subject: Re: [EXIM] sender_host_[accept|reject]_relay and performance?
On Mon, 10 May 1999 08:20:27 +0100, you wrote:
>If you are using dbm type lookups then the lookup cost is relatively
>independent of the size of list. The reverse DNS is more costly, but
>you may be doing that already. Unless you have particular DNS problems
>then the cost of doing this blocking is close on zero against the other
>costs of doing mail. Remember that doing relay accept on modem pools
>normally just requires a small number of net blocks to be allowed using
>sender_net_accept_relay - which has a cost very close to zero.


So I read that a rejection of mail for selected hosts (such as the
open relays of one's customers) won't post a serious performance hit
on any "big" mail host running on reasonably sized hardware?

That's what I wanted to know :-)

Greetings
Marc

-- 
-------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -----
Marc Haber          |   " Questions are the         | Mailadresse im Header
Karlsruhe, Germany  |     Beginning of Wisdom "     | Fon: *49 721 966 32 15
Nordisch by Nature  | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fax: *49 721 966 31 29


--
*** Exim information can be found at http://www.exim.org/ ***