On Fri, 23 Apr 1999 020shero@??? wrote:
> Debug output from the old and new versions follow.
Ah yes, I now remember the change. The value of $domain that you are
using in the wits router is now the original domain of the address, not
the domain that is being routed. The ChangeLog item for Exim 2.00 reads:
1. When routing, only domain and localpart were set as variables; things like
original_domain were not. This was an oversight. (Hindsight: this actually
changed the value of $domain in routers to the address domain instead of the
route_domain value it had previously. This matters only if an address has
passed through an instance of domainlist that passed on a different domain.
Thinking about it, I have decided to leave it alone - the routing domain can
be obtained in subsequent domainlist routers by $0, and it will be the address
domain that is set in any transports.)
So the answer is to change your wits router to refer to $0 instead of to
$domain.
Regards,
Philip
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
--
*** Exim information can be found at
http://www.exim.org/ ***
