On Thu, 18 Feb 1999 09:31:14 +0000, Nigel Metheringham wrote:
>Responses should go to the sender, not automatically to the list in
>general (that should be an explicit choice). In general replies to
>specifics should all go to the originator of the question who should then
>summarise to list later.
Wrong, wrong, WRONG.
>See
> http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
> http://www.halisp.net/halisp/reply-to-harmful.html
Also:
http://www.unicom.com/BBS/bbs_forum.cgi?forum=replyto&read=000038-000000.msg&session=36cc0cd566c2cd45&use_last_read=on&last_read=0
My reply to that BS and goes, point by point, tearing it to shreads. As
I said in a private reply, here's the short form: RFC822 expressly allows
for the reply-to to be changed for discussion lists. I assume that people
here *have* read 822?
- --
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
- -------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
--
*** Exim information can be found at
http://www.exim.org/ ***
