It had happened before, but I thought I would fiorst of all do a reboot
and install 2.11. It may have been that we had a second copy running
somehow... With ps it;s a bit hard t tell whether you have one exim
running or lots. All the processes look similar.
Anyway, so far it hasn't come back yet.
Thanks,
Ben
On Wed, 3 Feb 1999, Philip Hazel wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Feb 1999, Ben Parker wrote:
>
> > Why would snippets of log end up in the messages like this?
>
> Hmm. Those look like rather precise snippets, to wit, whole lines,
> rather than random junk.
>
> There's nothing in the ChangeLog about any subsequent fix that seems to
> relate to this, and it hasn't been reported before. Has it happened more
> than once?
>
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 23:00:28 +0200
> > From: Pat Banks <pat@???>
> > To: Ben Parker <ben@???>
> > Subject: Re: your mail
>
> It might be interesting to see all the other headers, particularly the
> Received: ones. How did the delivery time relate to these log entries?
>
> --
> Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
> ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
>
>
> --
> *** Exim information can be found at http://www.exim.org/ ***
>
> 1999-02-03 19:33:42 1085FF-0001Wf-00 <= exim-users-request@??? H=(mailsvr01.unep.org) [194.54.67.228] P=esmtp S=1973 id=Pine.SOL.3.96.990203162813.27518c-100000@???
>
>
--
*** Exim information can be found at
http://www.exim.org/ ***
