On Fri, 11 Sep 1998, Nigel Metheringham wrote:
> 1. In this case the address is likely to have come from an alias
> or similar on the local host. Maybe there would be some advantage
> to the parent address of the failing address also being output
> by the warning generator.
It is. Unfortunately, John's changes were done by rewriting.
> 3. Doesn't the DSN stuff overlap on this - original addresses and
> derived addresses?? [related to (1) above]
The more I look at DSN, the more I get put off.
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
--
*** Exim information can be found at
http://www.exim.org/ ***
