On Wed, 22 Jul 1998, Peter Radcliffe wrote:
> I've been using an autoreply director to try and mimic a bounce message,
> but I can't get it to have an evelope from of <>.
Odd. *All* replies sent by autoreply are supposed to have an envelope
sender of <>. There is no mechanism in the code for setting anything else.
<configuration snipped>
Even odder. I copied your director and transport exactly and when I sent
a message to "unknown@localhost", I got back
>From MAILER-DAEMON Thu Jul 23 09:39:01 1998
Return-path: <>
and no Sender header. This was all done on one machine with a local delivery.
I guess the way to find out what it is doing on your system is to run
exim -d9 nobody@localhost
<text>
.
and see what the debugging output tells us.
> I also want to get rid of the In-Reply-To: header, which I don't seem
> able to do.
There isn't any way to do this. The autoreply transport always creates
one for the message it sends. In fact, the headers add and remove stuff,
if set for autoreply, apply to the copy of the original message that it
includes.
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
--
*** Exim information can be found at
http://www.exim.org/ ***
