Re: [EXIM] Envelope-From:

> > Does anyone else on this list think that it could be useful if
> > Exim explicitly supported an Envelope-From: header the way it
> > does Envelope-To: ?
>
> Er, isn't that what Return-Path: is for?

Ummm. Er. Ahhh. mumble. Yes. Never mind.

Sorry about that - 'Return-Path:' triggers ancient memories from the
uucp days. I momentarily forgot the current RFC 822 mandated usage.



-Pat

--
*** Exim information can be found at http://www.exim.org/ ***