Nigel Metheringham <Nigel.Metheringham@???> writes:
> D.H.Sheryn@??? said:
> } Also I support the _option_ of syslogging the various logging outputs.
> } I understand that this doesn't work reliably in high load environments
> } (and indeed that packets may just get lost) but it would be really
> } handy for a bunch of relativley low volume workstations to be able to
> } forward important stuff (paniclog, and rejectlog, etc) to a central
> } logger.
>
> Of course there is always the option of running:-
>
> tail -f /var/log/exim/main.log | logger -t exim -p facility.level
Nooo!! That's *far* too easy and simple!
--
``If make doesn't do what you expect it to, it's a good chance the
makefile is wrong.'' -- Adam de Boor
--
*** Exim information can be found at
http://www.exim.org/ ***
