On Tue, 16 Jun 1998, Gyan Mathur wrote:
> > Have you got split_spool_directory set?
>
> Yes.
Oh, good. I discovered that the re-use code never has worked in that
case (and was hoping not to have to admit it in public :-)
> Ah -- thanks. I'm not that worried, as we haven't currently got so
> much traffic on this internal mail hub that we _need_ the more
> efficient network usage, just curious. If this will be fixed in the
> next release, then fine, I'll wait for that. Any time-scale on 1.93
> (which I hope will also contain the patch to work round clock
> corrections)?
Yes, it will be fixed in the next release, as will the clock stuff. I
don't think there will be a 1.93, since I've done a lot of development
towards 2.00 (hence the current 1.927 alpha - which does not have your
bug fixed; I only found it just before I went away). I suppose it will
be a couple of months before I start trying to pull together 2.00, but
as a number of problems in 1.927 have turned up, I will probably put out
another testing alpha fairly soon so that the testers have the latest
stuff to hammer on. Maybe in a few days' time.
--
Philip Hazel University Computing Service,
P.Hazel@??? New Museums Site, Cambridge CB2 3QG,
ph10@??? (sic) England. Phone: +44 1223 334714
--
*** Exim information can be found at
http://www.exim.org/ ***
