Re: [EXIM] syntactic rejection

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: John Henders
Date:  
To: Philip Hazel
CC: Neal Becker, exim-users
Subject: Re: [EXIM] syntactic rejection
On Wed, Dec 10/97, Philip Hazel <ph10@???> wrote:

> >         if (!isalnum((uschar)*s) && *s != '.' && *s != '-' && *s != '_')

>
> I have an item on the wish list to invent an more general option for this,
> e.g. a regular expression.


I'm not sure if it would be worth the effort to do a whole regex for
this. The underscore is the only illegal character I've seen cause a
problem. Does anyone know why it's illegal in the first place?

-- 
  Artificial Intelligence stands no chance against Natural Stupidity.
            GAT d- -p+(--) c++++ l++ u++ t- m--- W--- !v
                 b+++ e* s-/+ n-(?) h++ f+g+ w+++ y*



--
*** Exim information can be found at http://www.exim.org/ ***