Re: Administrative prohibition ?

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Philip Hazel
Date:  
To: Piete Brooks
CC: Nigel R. Armfield, exim-users
Subject: Re: Administrative prohibition ?
On Fri, 31 Oct 1997, Piete Brooks wrote:

> > It is it literally that, there is a bug somewhere, because a 2-line
> > message like that is syntactically invalid.
> [ I assume "If it is" ... ]


These little short words are so confusing... :-)

> Might I be correct in guessing that the error message is that seen by the
> sending *USER* rather than by the sending *MTA* ?


That sounds very plausible. Pity the wording isn't a bit clearer,
though.

-- 
Philip Hazel                   University Computing Service,
ph10@???             New Museums Site, Cambridge CB2 3QG,
P.Hazel@???          England.  Phone: +44 1223 334714



--
* This is sent by the exim-users mailing list.  To unsubscribe send a
    mail with subject "unsubscribe" to exim-users-request@???
* Exim information can be found at http://www.exim.org/