On Thu, 28 Aug 1997, Chris Thompson wrote:
> The bug turns out to have been there ever since item 30 in the Changelog
> 1.62 => 1.70 section was implemented, i.e. a long time ago in terms of
> testing versions (e.g. before 1.651). How come none of us noticed it ? :-(
I think I made a mistake in not logging the intermediate testing version
numbers in the ChangeLog file. The testing versions got more widespread
than I had envisaged. Next time I will leave them in.
--
Philip Hazel University Computing Service,
ph10@??? New Museums Site, Cambridge CB2 3QG,
P.Hazel@??? England. Phone: +44 1223 334714
