On Jun 30, Philip Hazel <ph10@???> wrote:
>
> I had a similar thought. That is why what I implemented (but have
> currently cut out of the source) allows you to specify a regular
> expression to extract the timestamp from the local part.
Is it too late to get this back in but undocumented? If you are going to
be using it for your local usage I think it would be nice to at least be
able to use it for my personal machine, though I would probably leave it
out of a general use machine unless I had time to come up with a user
friendly way of interfacing it with users.
> There
> seems no logic in this unless they are paid by the number of email
> addresses they claim to be mailing to.
>
I believe that is exactly the reason. However, Spamford also appears to
like being disliked and notorious, and doesn't seem to care if it hurts
the long term survival of his business.
--
Artificial Intelligence stands no chance against Natural Stupidity.
GAT d- -p+(--) c++++ l++ u++ t- m--- W--- !v
b+++ e* s-/+ n-(?) h++ f+g+ w+++ y*
