Re: Stumped on anti-relay

Página superior
Eliminar este mensaje
Responder a este mensaje
Autor: david
Fecha:  
A: Chris Thompson
Cc: exim-users
Asunto: Re: Stumped on anti-relay
On Sat, 24 May 1997, Chris Thompson wrote:

> David Miller writes
> >
> [...]
> > sender_net_accept_relay = 204.214.110.0/255.255.252.0
> > sender_net_accept_relay = 204.214.118.0/255.255.254.0
>
> The second of these will just override the first. You want
>
> sender_net_accept_relay =

204.214.110.0/255.255.252.0:204.214.118.0/255.255.254.0
> or
> sender_net_accept_relay = "204.214.110.0/255.255.252.0:\
>                            204.214.118.0/255.255.254.0"

>
> "exim -bP sender_net_accept_relay" might have been a good thing to check.
>
> Perhaps it would be better if Exim's configuration file parser complained
> about multiple definitions for the same option?


That would be a nice feature:)

>
> Anyway, surely you mean 204.214.108.0/255.255.252.0 or
> 204.214.110.0/255.255.254.0, not 204.214.110.0/255.255.252.0 ?


I mean networks 204.214.110, 204.214.111, 204.214.112, 204.214.113,
204.214.118 and 204.214.119. That would be
204.214.110.0/255.255.252.0:204.214.118.0/255.255..254.0 wouldn't it?

Thanks! :)

--- David

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
        It's *amazing* what one can accomplish when 
            one doesn't know what one can't do!