Re: refused relay problems?

Página superior
Eliminar este mensaje
Responder a este mensaje
Autor: Philip Hazel
Fecha:  
A: Neal Becker
Cc: exim-users
Asunto: Re: refused relay problems?
On 20 Mar 1997, Neal Becker wrote:

> Yes, I see - it didn't like the sender "<>". Should this maybe be an
> execption?


I don't know. It depends on your circumstances. It opens the door to
spammers who know about it. You should be able to specify it explicitly,
I think by

sender_address_relay = *comsat.com:^$

though I must admit I have not tried that.

--
Philip Hazel                   University Computing Service,
ph10@???             New Museums Site, Cambridge CB2 3QG,
P.Hazel@???          England.  Phone: +44 1223 334714