>>>>> "Philip" == Philip Hazel <ph10@???> writes:
Philip> On Thu, 20 Mar 1997, Neal Becker wrote:
>> I've noticed a number of these:
>> ---------------
>> 1997-03-20 02:40:01 refused relay (sender) to
>> owner-nt-list@??? from <> H=hyperion.cmc.comsat.com
>> [134.133.173.170]
>> ---------------
>>
>> Here's my relay setup:
>>
>> --------------
>> # anti-abuse
>> sender_host_accept_relay = *.comsat.com
>> # ensure that all outgoing relays have legit sender
>> sender_address_relay = *comsat.com
>> --------------
>>
>> So why was this refused?
Philip> Because the sender address didn't match *comsat.com.
>> Would we see different messages to differentiate the
>> sender_host_accept_relay rule vs. the sender_address_relay rule?
Philip> Yes. The "(sender)" in the messsage indicates it was the sender it
Philip> didn't like. Otherwise it would have said "(host)".
Yes, I see - it didn't like the sender "<>". Should this maybe be an
execption?
