>>>>> "Philip" == Philip Hazel <ph10@???> writes:
>> I would rather create another transport that mail adminstrators use
>> instead of the current pipe transport.
Philip> Why do you think it should be another transport rather than
Philip> an option on the existing pipe transport?
Actually, an option on the pipe transport would be fine, I guess. I
would just like the option to default to the current methodology, and
for the user to be able to configure which shell and args to use when
it is used.
--
David Blacka Software Engineer Directory Services/
davidb@??? Network Solutions, Inc. RWhois Development
