Re: EXim and address_pipe

Página superior
Eliminar este mensaje
Responder a este mensaje
Autor: Philip Hazel
Fecha:  
A: Piete Brooks
Cc: exim-users
Asunto: Re: EXim and address_pipe
On Fri, 6 Dec 1996, Piete Brooks wrote:

> IFF the pipe is the **ONLY** delivery mechanism.


It often is.

> They may look when email dries up (shortly after they changed their
> .forward)


Yup.

> The postmaster might notice.


Maybe.

> I am **NOT** convinced.


Your prerogative. That's why there's an option. My prerogative to set
the default the way I want it. :-)

>    The *DEFAULT* should be to bombard postmaster, who can then turn it off.


I can no longer remember the background to why I had it set this way
back in the smail days, but I think we had users who were running pipes
to commands that always sent back non-zero statuses, even when they had
done their job.

>    I feel srongly on this one ...


Oh dear.

[[You can write cron jobs to scan the logs...]]

I'll think about an option "tell postmaster if non-zero rc from pipe".

--
Philip Hazel                   University Computing Service,
ph10@???             New Museums Site, Cambridge CB2 3QG,
P.Hazel@???          England.  Phone: +44 1223 334714