>
> On Fri, 6 Dec 1996, Bruce Rodger wrote:
>
> > So are the default values for the address_pipe transport sensible? Is
> > there really a need for ignore_status here?
>
> I suspect that this is a cleft stick issue. For myself, if one of our
> users screws up a pipe command, I don't want to know, so I want
True. But i want that user to know about it!
Bruce.
> ignore_status set. In cases where I configure the mailer to run some
> pipe under my control I may want to check the status.
>
> I don't think the current default is hugely wrong, and therefore on
> compatibility grounds I don't think it should change.
>
>
> --
> Philip Hazel University Computing Service,
> ph10@??? New Museums Site, Cambridge CB2 3QG,
> P.Hazel@??? England. Phone: +44 1223 334714
>
>
--
Bruce Rodger |Bruce.Rodger@??? PGP key available
Computer Centre |http://www.strath.ac.uk/CC/People/bruce.html
The University of Strathclyde | +44 (0)141 548 3460
Glasgow G4 0LN, Scotland. | Fax 553 4100
