>>>>> "Philip" == Philip Hazel <ph10@???> writes:
Philip> On Sun, 24 Nov 1996, Neal Becker wrote:
>> I have been using receiver_verify together with the gone_away config I
>> previously sent in (repeated below). Does this make any sense? If
>> receiver_verify is on, won't it simply fail at RCPT_TO time and the
>> rest of the gone_away stuff will never be triggered, except for
>> messages that originate locally?
Philip> Indeed, that is what will happen. You will have to remove the
Philip> "fail_verify" option on the director. Then it won't fail at RCPT TO
Philip> time. The problem with this is that if you are also using sender_verify,
Philip> it won't fail senders that are gone away.
Why would I care? Won't this only affect messages that claim they are
from nonexistent users? Seems a minor point.
Actually, I think the easiest solution is just turn off
receiver_verify.
