Re: Bad address.

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Philip Hazel
Date:  
To: Lee McLoughlin
CC: exim-users
Subject: Re: Bad address.
On Thu, 24 Oct 1996, Lee McLoughlin wrote:

> exim 0.52 on a sparc running sunos 4.1.3u1 trying to reach the following
> address:
>
>    d..j..brunswick.swi0104@???

>
> /usr/lib/sendmail -bt -v
> > d..j..brunswick.swi0104@???
> exim: d..j..brunswick.swi0104@???
> - bad address: expected word or '<'
>
> A quick check of RFC822 shows that '..' is invalid as a null part isn't
> allowed between the dots.
>
> However most other mailers allow it.


Sheesh. I think we need a new RFC stating where "most other mailers"
break the other RFCs, for the benefit of poor implementers like me. :-)

I'll see what I can do for 0.57 - you are *just* in time.

--
Philip Hazel                   University Computing Service,
ph10@???             New Museums Site, Cambridge CB2 3QG,
P.Hazel@???          England.  Phone: +44 1223 334714