On 30/07/2024 12:52, Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-users wrote:
> *If* I extended the config to allow admins to set the OpenSSL option
> SSL_OP_IGNORE_UNEXPECTED_EOF (and an equivalent gnutls option if I can
> find one) which ignores this detection, would you accept it into the
> exim code base ?
Probably - subject to documentation, working decently against older library
versions, project coding standards, and investigating whether existing
coding does anything in any (other) specific situation that renders it not needed.
> I realise that giving admins more options to fiddle gives them more
> rope to hang themselves, so this would be a build-time option.
Mmm. I'm less certain on that. Having more build-variants to test is
in itself a major project cost.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## subscription configuration (requires account):
##
https://lists.exim.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/exim-users.lists.exim.org/
## unsubscribe (doesn't require an account):
## exim-users-unsubscribe@???
## Exim details at
http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list -
http://wiki.exim.org/
