On 2024-04-28 Jeremy Harris via Exim-users <exim-users@???> wrote:
> On 28/04/2024 06:05, Andreas Metzler via Exim-users wrote:
>> The router fails all bounces where
>> inbound_srs{} fails, not only the ones that "look SRS'd".
> It assumes that you really are SRS'ing all outbounds, therefore
> any bounce not SRS (in addition to those with bad SRS) is
> de-facto not valid.
> If the "all outbounds" does not hold in your configuration
> then you would need more complexity for this element.
Hello,
There is progress. ;-)
inbound_srs_failure only handles addresses with valid SRS-syntax (That
is what I missed before.) that have not been grabbed by inbound_srs,
i.e. they have a wrong checksum or fail the timestamp < 10 day check.
These message are rejected with a nice error message.
So afaiui the whole point of this router is to produce a nice error
instead of a generic "Unrouteable address". - Does this make sense?
cu Andreas
--
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grateful to you.'
`I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'
--
## subscription configuration (requires account):
##
https://lists.exim.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/exim-users.lists.exim.org/
## unsubscribe (doesn't require an account):
## exim-users-unsubscribe@???
## Exim details at
http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list -
http://wiki.exim.org/
