On Sun, 21 Jan 2024, Exim Bugzilla via Exim-dev wrote:
> https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3047
>
> --- Comment #21 from Simon Arlott <bugzilla.exim.simon@???> ---
> (In reply to Andrew Aitchison from comment #20)
>> This patch (against 4.97.1) should tell us whether PCRE wants too much
>> store, or a negative amount.
>
> PCRE2_SIZE is size_t, so the value of "size" cannot be negative.
Oops, yes. Bad wording.
What bothers me is that function_store_malloc is given an unsigned 64bit
value and passes it on to store_malloc as a signed 32bit value.
> What's needed is a reliable way to reproduce it.
> All I get is a request for 112 bytes for each and every check_dir_size().
Yes, though as Jeremy says, that *may* be a PCRE problem.
For now should we revert 4.97 to what we had before
https://git.exim.org/exim.git/commitdiff/c3d7f28680dda05ca6d8415cffbff8a233c0ae74
introduced function_store_get ?
--
Andrew C. Aitchison Kendal, UK
andrew@???
--
## subscription configuration (requires account):
##
https://lists.exim.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/exim-dev.lists.exim.org/
## unsubscribe (doesn't require an account):
## exim-dev-unsubscribe@???
## Exim details at
http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list -
http://wiki.exim.org/
