Thanks. This is possible, the old version is still installed, but I was
testing direct from the compiled binary directory assuming (probably
incorrectly by the sounds of things) it was self contained except for the
config.
Is there a way to test without the other in conflict, or do you have to go
the full hog and go for a final make install to test properly ? Would it be
safe to do a make DESTDIR=/some/directory/ install and run from that, or
would it still have issues ?
Thanks a lot for the help.
On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 5:01 PM Ian Z via Exim-users <
exim-users@???> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 02:03:30PM +0000, Ian B via Exim-users wrote:
>
> > Thanks, default was OpenSSL 1.0.1e-fips however, I've just tried
> > compiling a new OpenSSL 1.1.1w, (output below), but weirdly I get an
> > error when testing sending a message with it...
>
> > exim: malformed message id 1rDlww-000000002Hg-16uR after -Mc option
>
> The format of the message ids has changed in 4.97. This looks a bit as
> if you had both versions on your PATH and the wrong one got used
> here. Is that possible?
>
> --
> Ian
>
> --
> ## subscription configuration (requires account):
> ##
> https://lists.exim.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/exim-users.lists.exim.org/
> ## unsubscribe (doesn't require an account):
> ## exim-users-unsubscribe@???
> ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
> ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
>
--
## subscription configuration (requires account):
##
https://lists.exim.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/exim-users.lists.exim.org/
## unsubscribe (doesn't require an account):
## exim-users-unsubscribe@???
## Exim details at
http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list -
http://wiki.exim.org/
