On 28/09/2023 18:37, Ian Z via Exim-users wrote:
> I checked with `nm` and on this platform, at least, the
> lmtp code seems not to make it into the final executable. So the
> linker does its job, and all is explained. The redundant compile is
> still a bit suboptimal but I understand that we don't want to mess
> with the build setup.
I started spraying #ifdef everywhere... and then found that lookups
are handled (for this purpose) by script-hacking on the sub-makefile.
So (eventually) I might get around to doing similar for
all of routers, transports, authenticators.
> I would probably do the %Y thing differently ... but I'll cope.
One might argue that labelling these functions printf-like is not
valid, when they do different things. But GCC is running into the
identical issue what handling extensible-printf functions...
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## subscription configuration (requires account):
##
https://lists.exim.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/exim-users.lists.exim.org/
## unsubscribe (doesn't require an account):
## exim-users-unsubscribe@???
## Exim details at
http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list -
http://wiki.exim.org/
