https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3024
--- Comment #7 from Jeremy Harris <jgh146exb@???> ---
I've mulled that suggestion over for a while - and finally got to a killer:
it doesn't fix every case. Eventually someone will find a need to wrap one
reduce inside another, and use the "outer" $value (or equiv) within the "inner"
operation.
No, I've not thought of why it would be wanted! However...
That gets me started thinking of access to a stack of $value -
perhaps $value1 for the immediately-wrapping layer, $value2 for the next
one out, etc. Some amount of programming effort to implement, but feels
feasible.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
## subscription configuration (requires account):
##
https://lists.exim.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/exim-dev.lists.exim.org/
## unsubscribe (doesn't require an account):
## exim-dev-unsubscribe@???
## Exim details at
http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list -
http://wiki.exim.org/
