On 19/06/2023 11:52, Victor Ustugov via Exim-users wrote:
> This patch might be helpful:
>
> https://mta.org.ua/exim-4.94-conf/patches/exim-4.96-fix-opemdmarc-1.4.x-history_file/patch-src__exim-4.96-fix-opemdmarc-1.4.x-history_file.patch
I've pulled this into the Eim sourcebase, at f9c35778a660.
There remains the question over ARC result lines in the
dmarc history file. Does anyone have insight into the
values expected for "arc" and "arc_policy" by
libopendmarc 1.4.x ?
I could guess that "-" might be viable, by analogy with
the "rua" line coding, but that's not really sufficient.
The RFC standard for DMARC doesn't mention ARC. Is there
one somewhere?
[ And how in hell did libopendmarc not break
*everybody* with these changes?
]
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
## subscription configuration (requires account):
##
https://lists.exim.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/exim-users.lists.exim.org/
## unsubscribe (doesn't require an account):
## exim-users-unsubscribe@???
## Exim details at
http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list -
http://wiki.exim.org/
