[exim] Re: Dovecot pidgeonhole transport untaint $sender

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Jeremy Harris
Date:  
To: exim-users
Subject: [exim] Re: Dovecot pidgeonhole transport untaint $sender
On 11/05/2023 16:12, Evgeniy Berdnikov via Exim-users wrote:
> What about proposal in 1st comment to strip out "-f $sender_address"?
>
> IMHO, dovecot-lda doesn't need sender address. Unless sieve is used,
> with explicit reference to sender address.


I assumed the most likely use of something called "pidginhole"
was delivery to distinct folders, often by inspecting the sender.
But perhaps it can use the From: header?
--
Cheers,
Jeremy


--
## subscription configuration (requires account):
## https://lists.exim.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/exim-users.lists.exim.org/
## unsubscribe (doesn't require an account):
## exim-users-unsubscribe@???
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/