On 2023-01-07, Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-users <exim-users@???> wrote: > On Sat, 7 Jan 2023, Julian Bradfield via Exim-users wrote: ... >> But the question was, why is this panic-worthy? I thought the paniclog
>> was supposed to indicate that exim is seriously broken, not just
>> encountering some malformed email.
>
> IIUC the message was lost, which exim considers to be a big deal
> (though you know better in this instance).
Nope. The message just gets sent without signing.
(Remarkably, although it was as spammy as hell, gmail accepted it for
my user.)
