On Sat, 7 Jan 2023, Julian Bradfield via Exim-users wrote:
> On 2023-01-06, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users <exim-users@???> wrote:
>> You could perhaps configure to not attempt to sign such messages
>> by using a suitable expansion for dkim_domain. If you can't
>> use something like $sender_address then $max_received_line_length
>> might work.
>
> Or I could just reject them on receipt - they're spam, anyway.
>
> But the question was, why is this panic-worthy? I thought the paniclog
> was supposed to indicate that exim is seriously broken, not just
> encountering some malformed email.
IIUC the message was lost, which exim considers to be a big deal
(though you know better in this instance).
--
Andrew C. Aitchison Kendal, UK
andrew@???
