Re: [exim] DKIM: signing failed: LONG_LINE - in paniclog

On 2023-01-06, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users <exim-users@???> wrote:
> You could perhaps configure to not attempt to sign such messages
> by using a suitable expansion for dkim_domain. If you can't
> use something like $sender_address then $max_received_line_length
> might work.

Or I could just reject them on receipt - they're spam, anyway.

But the question was, why is this panic-worthy? I thought the paniclog
was supposed to indicate that exim is seriously broken, not just
encountering some malformed email.