Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-users wrote:
>
> > Slavko via Exim-users wrote:
> >> Dňa 9. 12. o 8:49 Victor Sudakov via Exim-users napísal(a):
> >>> Slavko via Exim-users wrote:
> >>>> Dňa 9. 12. o 5:15 Victor Sudakov via Exim-users napísal(a):
> >>>>
> >>>>> I've just sent two messages to you with Message-IDs <E1p3Uk1-000J4G-3I@???> and <E1p3UkO-000J4r-DZ@???>
> >>>>
> >>>> I got both and both has DKIM=pass in both, the exim (4.94.2) and rspamd
> >>>
> >>> What OS is exim running on?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> I am sorry, Debian bullseye (stable), exim is from debian repo, rspamd
> >> is from its repo, no own builds.
> >
> > So, if we both have Debian Bullseye and the stock exim, what could
> > make the difference?
>
> IIRC Debian has two versions of exim: light and heavy,
That is what I have installed:
$ apt list --installed | grep exim
exim4-base/stable,now 4.94.2-7 amd64 [installed,automatic]
exim4-config/stable,now 4.94.2-7 all [installed,automatic]
exim4-daemon-heavy/stable,now 4.94.2-7 amd64 [installed]
> and "split" and "non-split" config files.
I'm using a single /etc/exim4/exim4.conf file as I have a FreeBSD
background and am used to a single exim config. In fact, I hate the
split stuff very much.
I guess there is not much to configure for DKIM checking, it's
basically
"acl_smtp_dkim = acl_check_dkim" and then
begin acl
acl_check_dkim:
accept add_header = :at_start:${authresults {$primary_hostname}}
acl ...
--
Victor Sudakov VAS4-RIPE
http://vas.tomsk.ru/
2:5005/49@fidonet
