Re: [exim] dkim=fail (body hash mismatch; body probably mod…

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Jeremy Harris
Date:  
To: exim-users
Subject: Re: [exim] dkim=fail (body hash mismatch; body probably modified in transit)
On 05/12/2022 15:38, Bill Cole via Exim-users wrote:
> If you use relaxed instead of relaxed/relaxed, the unspecified body canonicalization is "simple" which is never what anyone should use.


It shouldn't be. The docs say:

"the current implementation only supports signing with
the same canonicalization method for both headers and body".
--
Cheers,
Jeremy