Re: [exim] dkim=fail (body hash mismatch; body probably mod…

Aquest missatge és part del següent fil:
	l'arbre de fils complet ordenat per data
	Bill Cole en
	Bill Cole en

Autor: Jeremy Harris
Data:
A: exim-users
Assumpte: Re: [exim] dkim=fail (body hash mismatch; body probably modified in transit)

On 05/12/2022 15:38, Bill Cole via Exim-users wrote:
> If you use relaxed instead of relaxed/relaxed, the unspecified body canonicalization is "simple" which is never what anyone should use.

It shouldn't be. The docs say:

"the current implementation only supports signing with
the same canonicalization method for both headers and body".
--
Cheers,
Jeremy

Aquest missatge es va enviar a les següents llistes de correu:
Exim-users Informació sobre la llista de correu \| Missatges propers		Re: [exim] dkim=fail (body hash mismatch; body probably modified in transit)	Re: [exim] dkim=fail (body hash mismatch; body probably modified in transit)

Tahini and Hummus and Cumin Development Archives administrat per cumin Admins

Lurker (versió 2.3)