[exim] smarthost Outsmarting me so Far (Victory at last)

トップ ページ
このメッセージを削除
このメッセージに返信
著者: Martin McCormick
日付:  
To: exim-users
古いトピック: Re: [exim] smarthost Outsmarting me so Far
題目: [exim] smarthost Outsmarting me so Far (Victory at last)
Slavko via Exim-users <exim-users@???> writes:
> You can even do auth with swaks...


    Quite true until now, the last several messages were via
swaks and I sincerely thank the author of that program for making
it available to us.  I guess I should apologize for butchering it
up a bit to facilitate using it in a way it really is not meant
to be used but I do like to use perl and was able to make the
slight modification to  it in order to talk to this list.


> Did you setup passwd.client file? See
> https://manpages.debian.org/bullseye/exim4-config/exim4_passwd_client.5.en.html
>
> You have to uses smarthost's PTR name, eventually with wildcards, eg:
>
> *.example.org:username:password
>
> While i do not suggest it, you can start with full wildcard and then go
> to more precise definition:
>
> *:username:password


    Here is where things get interesting.  I have used
passwd.client for the past 7 years and that file looked like:


# password file used when the local exim is authenticating to a remote
# host as a client.
#
# see exim4_passwd_client(5) for more documentation
#
# Example:
### target.mail.server.example:login:password
*.suddenlink.net:martin.m@???:BigSecret

    To get it to work now, I had to change the last line
credentials slightly as you suggested to try:  It now looks like


*:martin.m@???:StillBigSecret

    One of the people I spoke with with suddenlink Tech
Support said they had not made any changes.  I think the best one
can say is that I think they made some sort of upgrade which, to
some MTA's works the same way but to othersstops things dead in
their tracks.  They changed the port one starts with plus do not
appear to use 465 which had worked since 2015 but does nothing
now but briefly open a connection which drops after about 10
seconds.  They also changed the use of the wild card so I guess
that's no changes to some people and no worky for others.


    Thanks to everybody who had suggestions and I hope this
keeps working for a while now.


Martin McCormick