On Thu, 27 Jan 2022, Marcin Gryszkalis via Exim-users wrote:
> On 18.11.2021 21:00, Jeremy Harris via Exim-users wrote:> On 18/11/2021
> 10:35, Andrea Biscuola via Exim-users wrote:
>>> is. From what I was able to understand, we should modify the
>>> remote_smtp and
>>> remote_smtp_forward_transport sections to solve the problem, with the
>>> message_linelength_limit
>>> parameter set to something like "4096".
>>
>> The smtp transport has a relevant option.
>
> I just hit the same problem as Andrea. So
>
> - I wonder why did you decide that the limit on incoming mails can still be
> defined in configuration, but for outgoing mails it must be forced in the
> code?
>
> - What do you think about implementing re-folding headers to make mail
> RFC-compliant again (ie. fix what outlook spolied)?
Unfortunately that can break DKIM signatures.
> - I guess that with the new check you could update RCF.conform
>
> https://github.com/Exim/exim/blob/a1108b5118d32e969c5fe91b2110944f7483a7cb/doc/doc-misc/RFC.conform#L53
>
> best regards
> --
> Marcin Gryszkalis, PGP 0xA5DBEEC7 http://fork.pl/gpg.txt
>
> --
> ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
> ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
> ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
>
--
Andrew C. Aitchison Kendal, UK
andrew@???
