https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2838
--- Comment #12 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@???> ---
(In reply to Jeremy Harris from comment #11)
> You're saying the compiler has placed function_store_malloc() at an address
> that it cannot legally call, for 64b SPARC? Or am I misunderstanding?
I'm not sure yet what the alignment issue is. I was just guessing.
I have not fully understood the code yet and I'm still looking where
"store_malloc()" is defined.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
