On 11/17/21 11:56, Heiko Schlittermann via Exim-users wrote:
> Heiko Schlittermann via Exim-users <exim-users@???> (Mi 17 Nov 2021 13:17:33 CET):
>> Typo? What do you mean with "sender_rcvhost"?
> Mea culpa. You're talking about the variable to be expanded inside the
> Received header.
>
> But given this, I still can't see any issue with the logs you provided.
Same, I'd think, but according to the SpamAssassin folks its incorrect. According to them, a
Received line like the following indicates that the host was *not* verified, but Exim seems to have
fully verified the FcRDNS:
Received: from o13.mailer.shopify.com ([149.72.221.62])
by mail.as397444.net with esmtps TLS1.3 id 1mmjFb-0034Ki-02
(envelope-from <bounces+11006833-f9b2-vmstfpodc=mattcorallo.com@???>)
for vmstfpodc@???; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 21:10:54 +0000
Specifically, it seems Spamassassin is looking for something more postfix-esque like
Received: from o13.mailer.shopify.com (o13.mailer.shopify.com [149.72.221.62])
I haven't dug into any relevant RFCs to see who's fault it really is, but it seems Spamassassin and
Exim don't agree on how to communicate validated DNS.
Matt
