https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2813
--- Comment #24 from Adam Lackorzynski <adam@???> ---
(In reply to Jeremy Harris from comment #23)
> Aha. We stash info in the head of the malloc'd block, so our free wrapper
> would have to be used. So we have to lose the aforementioned accounting.
> I'm *really* disliking PAM now.
Oh yes, asymmetric memory allocation/freeing should be avoided.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.