https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2813
--- Comment #22 from Jeremy Harris <jgh146exb@???> ---
(In reply to Adam Lackorzynski from comment #19)
> This change does change anything for me. Also, in libpam's test suite the
> pamc structure is placed in static memory, and thus allocating this
> dynamically does not make a difference. I initially applied your patch until
> I noticed it's not addressing the issue.
So, it's curious that your patch makes a difference; string_copy_malloc()
just ends up calling malloc() (the libc one) so it should be essentially the
same. There has to be something else going on.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
