Re: [exim] GnuTLS vs OpenSSL

Startseite
Nachricht löschen
Nachricht beantworten
Autor: Andrew C Aitchison
Datum:  
To: exim-users
CC: exim-users
Betreff: Re: [exim] GnuTLS vs OpenSSL

On Sat, 18 Sep 2021, exim-users@??? via Exim-users wrote:

> I use testssl.sh (https://testssl.sh/) to verify my configuration
> (as there is nothing handy like the Qualys Test for HTTPS, IMHO).


Hardenize https://www.hardenize.com/ is not bad.

> Testing robust (perfect) forward secrecy, (P)FS -- omitting Null Authentication/Encryption, 3DES, RC4
>
> PFS is offered (OK)          TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 TLS_AES_128_CCM_SHA256
> ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256
> Elliptic curves offered:     prime256v1 secp384r1 secp521r1 X25519 X448
> Finite field group:          ffdhe2048 ffdhe3072 ffdhe4096 ffdhe6144 ffdhe8192

>
> Testing server preferences
>
> Has server cipher order?     yes (OK) -- TLS 1.3 and below
> Negotiated protocol          TLSv1.3
> Negotiated cipher            TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384, 256 bit ECDH (P-256)
> Cipher order
>    TLSv1.2:   ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 AES256-GCM-SHA384 AES256-CCM AES128-GCM-SHA256 AES128-CCM
>    TLSv1.3:   TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 TLS_AES_128_CCM_SHA256


> Besides this: About 85% of the incoming traffic is still unencrypted
> (for my statistics, mainly because some high volume mailing list
> servers do not use TLS), about 10% uses TLS1.3, 5% still uses TLS1.2
> (I log TLS ciphers via +tls_cipher in Exim).


It looks as though you do not allow TLSv1.1 - I suspect that a
substantial faction of that 85% would use it if you allowed it.
For email it is probably better to allow TLSv1.1 than reject it
and end up receiving the message in plain.

-- 
Andrew C. Aitchison                      Kendal, UK
                    andrew@???