[exim-cvs] rewrite: revert to unchecked result of parse_ext…

Página superior
Eliminar este mensaje
Responder a este mensaje
Autor: Exim Git Commits Mailing List
Fecha:  
A: exim-cvs
Asunto: [exim-cvs] rewrite: revert to unchecked result of parse_extract_address()
Gitweb: https://git.exim.org/exim.git/commitdiff/fef3133001a719b8dc8809f6bf50780f750a3e09
Commit:     fef3133001a719b8dc8809f6bf50780f750a3e09
Parent:     84227d174eec333d01ff494695bea0febf11575e
Author:     Heiko Schlittermann (HS12-RIPE) <hs@???>
AuthorDate: Mon Apr 26 16:16:49 2021 +0200
Committer:  Heiko Schlittermann (HS12-RIPE) <hs@???>
CommitDate: Thu May 27 21:31:00 2021 +0200


    rewrite: revert to unchecked result of parse_extract_address()


    Now it breaks 471, and overlong addresses won't make it into the rewrite
    process, as they are handled as empty.


    (cherry picked from commit 506286c62b8786a926dafb5bb05d3103492b86bc)
---
 src/src/rewrite.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)


diff --git a/src/src/rewrite.c b/src/src/rewrite.c
index f40c73c..6a6da47 100644
--- a/src/src/rewrite.c
+++ b/src/src/rewrite.c
@@ -488,18 +488,34 @@ while (*s)

/* There isn't much we can do for syntactic disasters at this stage.
Pro tem (possibly for ever) ignore them.
- If we got nothing, they there was any sort of error: non-parsable address,
+ If we got nothing, then there was any sort of error: non-parsable address,
empty address, overlong addres. Sometimes the result matters, sometimes not.
It seems this function is called for *any* header we see. */


   if (!recipient)
     {
+#if 0
+    /* FIXME:
+    This was(!) an attempt tho handle empty rewrits, but seemingly it
+    needs more effort to decide if the returned empty address matters.
+    Now this will now break test 471 again.
+
+    471 fails now because it uses an overlong address, for wich parse_extract_address()
+    returns an empty address (which was not expected).
+
+    Checking the output and exit if rewrite_rules or routed_old are present
+    isn't a good idea either: It's enough to have *any* rewrite rule
+    in the configuration plus "To: undisclosed recpients:;" to exit(), which
+    is not what we want.
+    */
+
     if (rewrite_rules || routed_old)
       {
       log_write(0, LOG_MAIN, "rewrite: %s", errmess);
       exim_exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
       }
+#endif
     loop_reset_point = store_reset(loop_reset_point);
     continue;
     }