Autor: Jesse Nicholls Data: A: Exim-users Assumpte: Re: [exim] DANE vs unknown CA
On 2021-05-03 18:07, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 06:33:24PM +0200, Heiko Schlittermann wrote:
>
> > For the upcoming 4.94.2 a patch is part of the 4.94.2+fixes branch
> > already. It will be cherry-picked to master soon.
>
> Got a pointer to the patch?
>
> > Thank you again for your fast response yesterday.
>
> You're welcome. Yes, there's a non-trivial number of domains where
> production of the correct certificate depends on sending the TLSA base
> domain as the SNI value. I am not a fan of per-host-domain MX
> hostnames, and associated reliance on SNI, but for some mysterious
> reason there are operators who prefer this model.
>
>
>
