Re: [pcre-dev] PCRE2 10.36 Released

yeah, and the #defines are right, which are what really matters.

On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 1:01 AM Philip Hazel <philip.hazel@???> wrote:

> Oh well, can't get *everything* right. Thanks for spotting it. At least I
> updated the date...
> Regards,
> Philip
>
>
> On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 23:59, enh <enh@???> wrote:
>
>> ...and not that you care, but i've updated AOSP to 10.36 (
>> https://android-review.googlesource.com/c/platform/external/pcre/+/1518244
>> ).
>>
>> i did notice you'd accidentally left "-RC1" in the ChangeLog, but it's
>> too late to fix that now :-)
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 1:07 PM Andrew Ho <webmaster@???> wrote:
>>
>>> Heyas,
>>>
>>> I've updated https://pcre.org and the SourceForge mirror accordingly!
>>>
>>> Cheers and hope everybody is doing as well as can be expected!
>>>
>>> Humbly,
>>>
>>> Andrew
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, 4 Dec 2020, Philip Hazel wrote:
>>>
>>> >I have just released 10.36. There have been no changes to the base code
>>> >since the Release Candidate, except to deal with a compiler warning in
>>> JIT.
>>> >There have, however, been some fixes and tidies in the testing scripts.
>>> >The release itself is mainly bug fixes and tidies. The only
>>> enhancements are
>>> >the addition of GNU grep's -m (aka --max-count) option to pcre2grep, and
>>> >also unifying the handling of substitution strings for both -O and
>>> callouts
>>> >in pcre2grep, with the addition of $x{...} and $o{...} to allow for
>>> >characters whose code points are greater than 255 in Unicode mode.
>>> >
>>> >NOTE: there is an outstanding issue with JIT support for MacOS on arm64
>>> >hardware. For details, please see Bugzilla issue #2618.
>>> >
>>> >Regards,Philip
>>>
>>> --
>>> ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/pcre-dev
>>>
>>