Auteur: Ian Zimmerman Date: À: exim-users Sujet: Re: [exim] tainted data issues
On 2020-11-11 18:14, Jeremy Harris wrote:
> > I will not argue with the rest of your post, but it is not a _modifier_
> > if it is always on.
>
> Ah. Would an expansion condition be sufficient? So you could write
>
> ${if tainted{my_suspect_expansion} {expand_this} {expand_that}}
>
> That would be simple to code and test.
I think this would be an improvement, yes. Then again, I seem to have
fewer quarrels with the current situation than others in this thread.
