Re: [exim] ISP recently updated exim via DirectAdmin

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Robert Nicholson
Date:  
To: exim-users
Subject: Re: [exim] ISP recently updated exim via DirectAdmin
When I try a test message it doesn’t show userfowrard router.

Exim version 4.94 #2 built 25-Jun-2020 07:25:17
Copyright (c) University of Cambridge, 1995 - 2018
(c) The Exim Maintainers and contributors in ACKNOWLEDGMENTS file, 2007 - 2018
Berkeley DB: Berkeley DB 5.3.21: (May 11, 2012)
Support for: crypteq IPv6 Perl OpenSSL move_frozen_messages Content_Scanning DKIM DNSSEC Event OCSP PIPE_CONNECT PRDR SPF TCP_Fast_Open Experimental_SRS
Lookups (built-in): lsearch wildlsearch nwildlsearch iplsearch cdb dbm dbmjz dbmnz dnsdb
Authenticators: cram_md5 dovecot plaintext spa
Routers: accept dnslookup ipliteral manualroute queryprogram redirect
Transports: appendfile/maildir/mailstore/mbx autoreply lmtp pipe smtp
Malware: f-protd f-prot6d drweb aveserver fsecure kavdaemon sophie clamd mksd avast sock cmdline
Fixed never_users: 0
Configure owner: 0:0
Size of off_t: 8
user@???
router = spamcheck_director, transport = spamcheck


> On Jul 12, 2020, at 6:52 PM, Robert Nicholson <robert.nicholson@???> wrote:
>
> My ISP uses the
>
> SpamBlockerTechnology* powered exim.conf, Version 4.5.26
>
> and now since that upgrade on Friday none of userforward stuff works.
>
> it all still looks pretty standard.
>
> userforward:
> driver = redirect
> domains = lsearch,ret=key;/etc/virtual/domainowners
> allow_filter
> check_ancestor
> check_local_user
> no_expn
> file = $home/.forward
> file_transport = address_file
> pipe_transport = address_pipe
> reply_transport = address_reply
> directory_transport = address_directory
> no_verify
>
> How can you debug a problem like this where you want to know why userforward has no affect?
>
> R=userforward no longer appears in the mainlog file.
>