Re: [exim] Spurious permission denied error

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Jeremy Harris
Date:  
To: exim-users
Subject: Re: [exim] Spurious permission denied error
On 28/04/2020 11:17, Andrew C Aitchison via Exim-users wrote:
>
> On 27/04/2020 20:52, Russell King via Exim-users wrote:
>> 2020-04-27 20:36:15 1jT9Y7-0003B4-Mf <= patchd@???
> U=patchd P=local S=1535
>> 2020-04-27 20:36:15 1jT9Y7-0003B4-Mf H=pandora.armlinux.org.uk
> [xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:214:fdff:fe10:1be6] Permission denied
>> 2020-04-27 20:36:17 1jT9Y7-0003B4-Mf => user@??? R=smart_route
> T=remote_smtp H=pandora.armlinux.org.uk
> [xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:214:fdff:fe10:1be6]
> X=TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256 CV=yes A=fixed_cram C="250 OK
> id=1jT9Y8-0004ff-Qf"
>>
>> My guess is that there is some file that exim can't access while
>> attempting to send to pandora, but I think working out what is
>> going to be very hard (I guess debug isn't allowed from non-root
>> users?)
>
> ... and followed up with:
>> and grepping the strace output for errors:
>>
>> 19841 openat(AT_FDCWD, "/var/spool/exim4//input//1jTM7j-0005A1-Na-D",
>> O_RDWR|O_CREAT|O_EXCL|O_LARGEFILE, 0640) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied)


On today's non-Unix "selinux" systems, you need to also worry
about the mostly-invisible marks placed on files... Turning selinux
to "permissive" may be a useful and quick test.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy